I attended the first V-Day Beppe Grillo, Bologna, and I remember being left impressed. Big impact of ideas, projects, but most of words and images. The fact is that all this office fell, can not be denied, since the proposals made in that situation could not collect the necessary signatures. Since then the movement Cricket has certainly made great strides in terms of the presence and image, just think of the result of Emilia-Romagna, but I think he had a major setback for the ideas. All that said shackle is in fact for years in the programs of the Greens and the Left whole. Combating insecurity, renewable energy, no to nuclear, etc.. All things that are part not only of the programs, but are the result of the ideologies of these parties. But then, why Grillo takes all these votes?
The first error should be given to PD. If they had accepted his nomination as the "problem" Cricket would be finished in no time. Would lose if the outlet is bad and would stop screaming or he would lose credibility. The other error is all the political leaders of the Left, which continues with impunity to underestimate the desire of many young people to participate in political life, or do not find suitable venues for inclusion. But why
Cricket can not be the right choice for Italy and for the voters of the left in particular, is easily understood.
What do you think of financial returns? Taxes?
What do you think of the cost of labor?
What do you think of immigration?
How do you plan to fight tax evasion, mafia, lobby?
What is your vision of foreign policy?
questions that those who voted Cricket will definitely not answer, because he does not speak of these things, or if he does talk about making jokes or satire shows, among other things, the highest level. But there is a political program with satire. Cricket live spot as Silvio Berlusconi, is certainly in very good faith as opposed to the rider, but is much closer to him than a serious and respectable leader. E 'lives and populist fears and frustrations of the people, really does not analyze the problems. If an incinerator are the people who live in the area intended for the construction of protest, and he is stuck with making his mark. Beautiful stuff, the same thing the league just a bit 'more nazionalpopolare. And then I ask you a question: why would a character who leads a political movement should be to pay an entrance fee to people who are listening to a campaign rally? Would you trust you and you give your vote to a person who applies and makes you pay for your ticket to hear him speak? I think not, so there's not much of a trust.
The first error should be given to PD. If they had accepted his nomination as the "problem" Cricket would be finished in no time. Would lose if the outlet is bad and would stop screaming or he would lose credibility. The other error is all the political leaders of the Left, which continues with impunity to underestimate the desire of many young people to participate in political life, or do not find suitable venues for inclusion. But why
Cricket can not be the right choice for Italy and for the voters of the left in particular, is easily understood.
What do you think of financial returns? Taxes?
What do you think of the cost of labor?
What do you think of immigration?
How do you plan to fight tax evasion, mafia, lobby?
What is your vision of foreign policy?
questions that those who voted Cricket will definitely not answer, because he does not speak of these things, or if he does talk about making jokes or satire shows, among other things, the highest level. But there is a political program with satire. Cricket live spot as Silvio Berlusconi, is certainly in very good faith as opposed to the rider, but is much closer to him than a serious and respectable leader. E 'lives and populist fears and frustrations of the people, really does not analyze the problems. If an incinerator are the people who live in the area intended for the construction of protest, and he is stuck with making his mark. Beautiful stuff, the same thing the league just a bit 'more nazionalpopolare. And then I ask you a question: why would a character who leads a political movement should be to pay an entrance fee to people who are listening to a campaign rally? Would you trust you and you give your vote to a person who applies and makes you pay for your ticket to hear him speak? I think not, so there's not much of a trust.
0 comments:
Post a Comment